Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 14:16

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Thank you.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Skyrim fans baffled after finding huge gold hoard we’ve never seen before - GAMINGbible

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

What’s next?

Who would win, an F-22 Raptor or Tie Defender?

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

$14B in EV, renewable projects scrapped as tax credit fears grow - Electrek

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Mahmoud Khalil vows to continue protests after release from detention - Politico

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

When did Elon Musk fall from grace?

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Should I believe JD Vance's claim that Tim Walz lied about needing medical intervention to get pregnant?

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Just in the last 5 years:

'Rock Showman' uncovers sandstone stegosaur near Whitby - BBC

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Amanda Seyfried, Adam Brody on Parenting, Jennifer's Body and More - Variety

Russia can stop this any time.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

How can I get over a break up?